xml t6 vs xm-l2

XML T6

• Lumens: 1000-1300
• Color temperature: 6500K (cool white)
• Power consumption: 10-12W
• Lifespan: 50,000 hours
• Beam angle: 120 degrees
• Throw distance: 200-300 meters
• Features: Durable, compact, affordable

XM-L2

• Lumens: 1000-1100
• Color temperature: 6500K (cool white)
• Power consumption: 10-12W
• Lifespan: 50,000 hours
• Beam angle: 120 degrees
• Throw distance: 200-250 meters
• Features: High-efficiency, bright, reliable

Comparison

Both the XML T6 and XM-L2 are popular LED emitters that offer similar performance. Here is a comparison of their key features:

• Lumens: Both emitters offer around 1000-1100 lumens, providing excellent illumination.
• Color temperature: Both emit a 6500K cool white light.
• Power consumption: Both consume around 10-12W.
• Lifespan: Both have a lifespan of 50,000 hours.
• Beam angle: Both emit a 120-degree wide beam.
• Throw distance: The XML T6 has a slightly longer throw distance of 200-300 meters compared to the XM-L2's 200-250 meters.
• Efficiency: The XM-L2 is generally considered to be more efficient than the XML T6.
• Cost: The XM-L2 is typically more expensive than the XML T6.

Conclusion

Both the XML T6 and XM-L2 are suitable for a wide range of lighting applications. The XML T6 is more affordable and offers a slightly longer throw distance, while the XM-L2 is more efficient and reliable. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the application.